We just finished our first week of Scissor Cut samples for 2011.
Friday, May 6, 2011
Scissor Cuts 5/3/11
We just finished our first week of Scissor Cut samples for 2011.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
EPA Exempts Milk from Oil Spill Regulations
New York Farm Bureau Released This 4/12/2011
NYFB has just received word that the Environmental Protection Agency has agreed to exempt dairy from the Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Program, which would have treated dairy products like oil because of the fat content and forced farmers to develop expensive and unnecessary oil spill plans for their milk.
“This is a huge victory for dairy farmers all throughout Upstate New York, one which has been a long time coming,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer, who strongly advocated against these regulations on behalf of dairy farmers. “Everyone knows that when Congress enacted these laws it was targeting massive oil spills and toxic substances, not an accident involving milk at one of our state’s small dairy farms. With this exemption, I can now ensure New York dairy farmers that they will no longer have to cry over spilled milk, let alone the costly preparation for it.”
Senator Gillibrand and Congressmen Gibson, Owens and Reed also supported farmers by asking EPA to exempt milk from the oil spill regulations and were co-sponsors of bills to do so.
While milk tanks and piping will now be exempt from the regulations, other oil and fuel tanks on a dairy may still be regulated under SPCC and farms should make sure they are in compliance. For more information, please see the October issue of Grassroots (page 4) or contact NYFB’s Kelly Young at kyoung@nyfb.org.
Monday, April 11, 2011
2011 Delaware County No Till School Presentations Available
Use of Aerators to Incorporate Manure in Minimum Till Systems
Weed Control updates for Corn and Small Grains
The Nitrogen Cycle
Why Soil pH Still Matters
Monday, March 14, 2011
Presentations on Grazing
At the 2011 Catskill Regional Dairy, Livestock and Grazing Conference there were a couple good presentations on grazing. One, by Dale Dewing of Cornell Cooperative Extension of Delaware County and Dan Flaherty of the Watershed Agricultural Council, touched on ways to extend the grazing season using stockpiled forage. Another, by Karen Hoffman of the New York Natural Resources Conservation Service, detailed the do's and don'ts of grazing dairy heifers. If either of these presentations are of interest to you - click below to hear the talk and see the slides!
Sunday, March 13, 2011
New DairyTie Stall Design Results in Improved Comfort and Animal Production
- Tailed stall length and width
- Elevated tie rail
- Forward tie rail palcement
- Neck chain length
- Elevated manger (relative to stall bed)
- Stall mattress/mat
- Cow trainer and trainer placement
- Headroom above water bucket
The original papers written by Dr Anderson on assessing cow comfort and implementing the new tie stall (and free stall) system can be accessed via the links below:
Assessing cow comfort and behavior
Canadian tie stall system design
Canadian free stall design
Friday, November 19, 2010
Free Choice Feeding Of Phosphorus Containing Minerals
The purpose of this fact sheet is to illustrate the problems producers can face with feeding minerals free choice. Conclusions from research and field trial results will be presented to demonstrate the limitations associated with this management practice.
The misconception that animals have an innate sense for a particular mineral began with reports published by South African researchers. In the early 1920s researchers described P-deficient cattle with depraved appetites chewing on bones. Bones contain significant levels of P, and the association was made that animals were able to select feeds to compensate for mineral deficiencies in the diet.
This was followed by additional research in the 1930s that indicated cows and lambs fed P-deficient diets may consume sufficient free choice P to meet their requirements. It was further demonstrated that when intake of P from feed sources increased, less free choice P-sources were consumed.
In the early 1950s, a paper appearing in the British Journal of Animal Behavior measured the preference of P-deficient cattle and sheep for supple mental calcium carbonate alone or combined with an equal part of dicalcium phosphate. Animals did not consume adequate levels of mineral to prevent P deficiency.
The studies from the early 1900s dealt with extreme deficiencies, and it is likely that P was not the only nutrient lacking in the diet. In contrast, the ingredients and diets fed to the modern dairy cow provide little chance of a P deficiency. In addition, it has been theorized that domestication has produced an animal that is more responsive to sensory qualities of feed than to its nutritive value.
Offering minerals free choice is appropriate when grazing livestock are not receiving any concentrates or supplemental feeds. However, this is not a typical scenario for the modern dairy operation.
The greatest limitation of feeding minerals free choice is the variation in consumption. The individual consumption of dicalcium phosphate by lactating dairy cattle was measured in a 1972 study. The variation was huge and mineral consumption ranged from zero to two pounds per day.
This same trend was demonstrated with beef cattle in Alberta, Canada. Not only was there a substantial range of intake (minimal to 1.7 pounds per day), but also the number of visits to the mineral feeders varied greatly. The days between visits to the mineral feeder ranged from 1.5 to 4.5 days. The researchers concluded that free choice feeding via a mineral feeder is not an acceptable method of providing minerals on a daily basis.
The approach of a cafeteria-style mineral feeder has been used for dairy cattle, especially animals being intensively grazed. These systems offer a range of 2 to 10 mineral choices. The primary disadvantage of this system is high feeding loss and increased expense. Cows typically do not consume sufficient amounts of minerals to meet their requirements. Animals are more likely to be influenced by taste or acceptability versus a craving for a particular element.
Controlling the level of P consumed is very important in light of the nutrient regulations being executed. A field trial conducted in Okeechobee, Florida during 1986-87 examined the effect of feeding free choice minerals on P excretion. Rations were formulated so cows would receive 0.52% P. In addition to dietary P, a free choice mineral mix with a minimum of 8.0% P was offered. Cows allowed access to the free choice mineral had a greater concentration of P in the feces. This field trial agrees with the numerous research studies cited in the 2001 NRC, which state that once the cow’s requirement for P is met, the excess will be excreted in the feces.
There have not been an overwhelming number of studies addressing free choice feeding of minerals. However, there is enough evidence with various ruminant trials (sheep, beef and dairy) to conclude that free choice feeding has many limitations and in today’s environment, there is little to no benefit to this practice for dairy producers.
Source: Virginia Ishler, Penn State Ag Extension
Monday, November 15, 2010
Think $5 Corn Is Expensive? Some Are Betting On $10 Next Year
For the whole article click Here